Bongovians had tended to include within their world view, the philosophies of those who had
come before. They intrinsically believed that Bongo was not a new god, bringing salvation to the
universe, but just another way of expressing eternal truths which only a select few may actually
comprehend at any given time, and that others would only come to, once they had achieved a
certain enlightenment.
They referred to the stories of Bongo as metaphor, and felt that their deeper meanings were
lost when literalized. They offered logical proofs that the stories were not meant to be taken literally.
How, after all, could the Great God Bongo be surveying her dominion when reality had not even been
created yet? Upon what road did he walk? Upon what hill did she stand in order to do all of this
surveying? How, in fact, could any act be accomplished before the beginning of time, when every
action requires the compass of space and time within which to be manifest? The Bongovists countered
that the glory of Bongo cannot be comprehended by mankind, and only absolute faith in His word
could lead to salvation. Bongovians felt that blind faith and dogma were antagonistic to the nurturing
of the mind and the spirit, and they further added that Bongo had never claimed to be an exclusive god,
but an inclusive one. To prove this assertion they cited many previous doctrines – the Buddha, Dionysus,
Pythagorus… the Gnostic Christ, to name but a few – and demonstrated how these prophets had all
historically vaunted identical philosophical concepts and wisdom to that of Bongo, long before the Ninth
of April, Nineteen Ninety-Seven.
But, and as proof that genius doesn’t need to be restricted by logical thought, one clever
Bongovist, named Justin Turtle, explained it this way. He figured it as a given that belief in the
Great God Bongo was the salvation of the world. Therefore the truths that Bongo brings must be
unique… or else we could all have been saved without Bongo. As it is therefore impossible for Bongo’s
words not to have been original, any historical pre-echoes of His thoughts must have been put there
(in order to confuse those who possess insufficient faith) by someone who is, not only antagonistic to
Bongo, but also has the ability to travel through time. This then would have to be the Devil, Satan,
Beelzibub, Lucifer, Cacodemon, Dybbuk, Apollyion, Old Nick… whatever you prefer to call him. And so
the term “Satanic Impersonation” was introduced to describe a type of imitation which occurs before the
existence of the thing it is imitating. This concept, along with others, such as “Circular Logic” (which
insisted that “if Bongo says something then it must be true because Bongo said it was, and everything that
Bongo says is true”) had many a Bongovian scratching his or her head in exasperation. Of course they
tried to reaffirm the idea that there was no other thing than Bongo, therefore no Devil, or dark destructive
power could exist outside of Bongo. But the Bongovists were not having any of this kind of rarefied or
subtle intellectualizing, which they considered wishy-washy and, quite frankly, somewhat demonic.